Shaping the Law Curriculum with Authentic Assessment
Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) Simulation and Dispute System Design (DSD) in Legal Education
Abstract
This article updates the author’s earlier study, “Online Dispute Resolution Simulation: Shaping the Curriculum for Digital Lawyering” (Wang 2021a), while advancing a distinct pedagogical contribution: it extends the original online dispute resolution (ODR) simulation framework to incorporate dispute system design (DSD) as a means of teaching students not only to participate in dispute resolution, but also to design, evaluate and govern technology-enabled dispute systems. The original study demonstrated how ODR simulation workshops create a virtual learning environment in which students develop both legal and digital competencies for future professional practice. Conducted since 2007 with undergraduate and postgraduate law students at Brunel University of London and other institutions and initially supported by funding from the Nominet Trust in 2010, these workshops promote active participation, intercultural communication and reflective practice, while strengthening skills in legal reasoning, problem-solving and digital communication. Building on this foundation, the article evaluates DSD as a new teaching initiative implemented within the University of London distance learning Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) module and Brunel University of London’s Internet Law module. While ODR simulation and DSD differ in emphasis—practical dispute resolution versus system design—both employ authentic assessment, requiring students to apply knowledge and skills to realistic scenarios. Together, these approaches deepen engagement, foster critical reflection and enhance professional readiness for technology-enabled dispute resolution and digital lawyering.
Keywords: online dispute resolution; dispute system design; artificial intelligence; authentic assessment; team-based learning; student-centred learning; research-informed teaching.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Those who contribute items to Amicus Curiae retain author copyright in their work but are asked to grant two licences. One is a licence to the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London, enabling us to reproduce the item in digital form, so that it can be made available for access online in the open journal system, repository, and website. The terms of the licence which you are asked to grant to the University for this purpose are as follows:
'I grant to the University of London the irrevocable, non-exclusive royalty-free right to reproduce, distribute, display, and perform this work in any format including electronic formats throughout the world for educational, research, and scientific non-profit uses during the full term of copyright including renewals and extensions'.
The other licence is for the benefit of those who wish to make use of items published online in Amicus Curiae and stored in the e-repository. For this purpose we use a Creative Commons licence (http://www.creativecommons.org.uk/); which allows others to download your works and share them with others as long as they mention you and link back to your entry in Amicus Curiae and/or SAS-SPACE; but they can't change them in any way or use them commercially.
