Juridical Cohesion and Tactics of Shadow and Fog
Law’s Withdrawing Shadow and its “Dark Matter”
Abstract
The issue central to this article involves tactics used by Dutch agro-industries in close cooperation with successive Dutch Governments and the Ministry of Agriculture to hide the real extent of, and responsibility for, pollution caused by pesticides, herbicides (like glyphosate) and, in particular, an excess of nitrogen emissions. One tactic is to avoid confrontations in court and to operate in what has been called the “shadow of the law”. The other one is to hide the reality of things through a discursive or representational “fog”. One aim of such tactics is to make the prosecution opt for settlement instead of fully enforcing the law, what is defined here as the “withdrawing shadow of the law”. A second but connected aim is to weaken a society’s juridical cohesion, imagined metaphorically here as law’s “dark matter”. Physically, this is the elusive mass that is needed to explain what holds together galaxies; juridically, it is what holds societies together under a rule of law that serves justice.
Keywords: shadow of the law; rule of law; corporate legal tactics; juridical cohesion; dragging.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Those who contribute items to Amicus Curiae retain author copyright in their work but are asked to grant two licences. One is a licence to the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London, enabling us to reproduce the item in digital form, so that it can be made available for access online in the open journal system, repository, and website. The terms of the licence which you are asked to grant to the University for this purpose are as follows:
'I grant to the University of London the irrevocable, non-exclusive royalty-free right to reproduce, distribute, display, and perform this work in any format including electronic formats throughout the world for educational, research, and scientific non-profit uses during the full term of copyright including renewals and extensions'.
The other licence is for the benefit of those who wish to make use of items published online in Amicus Curiae and stored in the e-repository. For this purpose we use a Creative Commons licence (http://www.creativecommons.org.uk/); which allows others to download your works and share them with others as long as they mention you and link back to your entry in Amicus Curiae and/or SAS-SPACE; but they can't change them in any way or use them commercially.
